Welcome back to the mystifying vortex of Alfred Hitchcock’s “Vertigo”– a film that always rewards us with something new. This week marks the anniversary of its world wide premiere, and what better time to look closer at the man at the center of it all. As a long time fan, my intention is not to write a definitive analysis–that has been done brilliantly elsewhere–but to propose an additional interpretation of this complex film.
In the first post of this series, we focused on Carlotta’s reappearing necklace and Scottie’s reaction to Midge’s self portrait — how seeing Midge reflected in the image of his obsession deeply unsettles him. That reaction is what we will explore today.
Scottie is one of the most polarizing figures in Hitchcock’s oeuvre, and rightfully so.
His actions are deeply troubling, a product of an unhinged mind. But is there more to Scottie than we initially see, a man hopelessly obsessed with an enigmatic beauty?
Perhaps there is something driving his obsession that goes straight into the core of who he is and where the story must ultimately take him.
The Blindness of Vertigo

To fully understand Scottie, let’s draw on the few background details Hitchcock and the writers give us about him.
Firstly, we know he has a college education and is a former detective. This is discussed in his meeting with Gavin Elster, his old college buddy.
As a detective, we know Scottie is a man driven by logic, finding clues, and piecing them together.
Then one day on the job, he becomes paralyzed by a psychological case of vertigo caused by guilt and trauma. It follows him, haunts him, and won’t let him go.

When he meets the most bewildering blonde who turns his world upside down, once again there’s a case for him to solve, but the answers elude him because this woman is not plagued by tangible threats but by the trauma of a distant past.
In the mastery of his logical world Scottie tries to reason her fears away. “You see? There’s a reason for everything. Madeleine, try,” he tells her. But this he does in vain because her trauma, akin to his vertigo, cannot be chased away with logic.
Watching this scene, I feel that in Scottie’s overwhelming obsession with helping Madeleine conquer her demons, there is a desperate plea to be free of his own.
This projection of his healing onto her, I call the “twin cure”. I imagine Scottie thinking, “If I save her, maybe I can conquer my own fears. If I can help her, maybe I can finally heal myself.”
Sadly, Scottie cannot cure his vertigo through Madeleine and the twin cure is ultimately futile.
Choosing Self-Deception

Returning to the disturbing scene where Midge realizes Scottie is being consumed by the fantasy of Madeleine…
By painting herself into Carlotta’s portrait, is Midge saying, “Notice me, I can be part of your world”? Is she using his language–the portrait, Carlotta, the necklace–to try and break through to him? Or is she poking fun at this silly ghost story?
Whatever her intentions, Scottie sees the painting and immediately feels that something is wrong.
To Scottie, Midge has invaded his fantasy by appropriating the image of his obsession. He can’t articulate why, but he rejects it and walks away. Whatever she’s offering by inserting herself into Carlotta’s world, he adamantly refuses it.
Midge, his oldest and most loyal friend, is simply too real. She represents everything Scottie is fleeing — the present, the tangible, the truth -and her intrusion into his fantasy creates a dissonance he cannot bear.
Scottie’s rejection of reality means that the fantasy must be maintained–until it isn’t.
Through the Fog

In our first post we simply noticed — the necklace, and the three women who wear it. Hitchcock gives it close-up after close-up, demanding we pay attention.
Does the necklace curse whomever it adorns, or does its presence hold a deeper meaning than a decorative plot device?
For now, it is enough that we notice — even if Scottie cannot.
Next: But Scottie wasn’t the only one building illusions. In the next post, we examine two architects — and the delicate dance between illusion and truth that neither can control.
All images: Vertigo (1958, Paramount Pictures) via Film-Grab and IMDb
Discover more from The Classic Movie Muse
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


“Midge, his oldest and most loyal friend, is simply too real. She represents everything Scottie is fleeing — the present, the tangible, the truth -and her intrusion into his fantasy creates a dissonance he cannot bear.
Scottie’s rejection of reality means that the fantasy must be maintained–until it isn’t.”
I’m just going to come out and say it, Ari. I adore your brain so-freaking-much, girl 😂💕
You’ve nailed it.
I come away from watching that scene with a bunch of conflicting emotions and confusing thoughts and as always, you have been able to sum it all up so eloquently and beautifully here.
I also think your framing of Scottie’s ‘blindness’ against his background prior to the episode of vertigo delivers such a rich layer of understanding to his character.
“In the mastery of his logical world Scottie tries to reason her fears away. “You see? There’s a reason for everything. Madeleine, try,” he tells her. But this he does in vain because her trauma, akin to his vertigo, cannot be chased away with logic.”
Ari…honestly…I just…. 🙌 🙌 YES 🙌 🙌 SO SPOT ON 🙌 🙌 Xx
You are too funny, Lee! Thank you so much for the kind compliment <3 I agree - that scene is soo difficult to watch. We can viscerally feel the discomfort of both Midge and Scottie without knowing exactly what it all means. It's a baffling scene, brilliantly done.
I'm so glad that the reading of Scottie's 'blindness' hit a chord with you! He's a fascinating character to dive into. Thanks for coming along on this ride with me! xo
Thanks for the reminder to see this movie. I am sure I saw it ages ago but I really want to discuss this with you.. added to my to watch list again, thanks Ari.
Gill, I’m so glad this was a good reminder for you to revisit it! I’d truly love to hear your thoughts once you do. I suspect that with your expertise, you’ll be fascinated by the way Hitchcock explores the psychological layers of the characters. I can’t wait to discuss it further with you!
Still got Picnic to discuss with you… So many films, this, that and Camelot!
Sounds like we have great times ahead. Yay, bring it on! 🙂
You make so many good points here, Ari. Cannot wait for part 3. What I love most about the film is that I will often notice new things or have a new perspective on certain moments/characters than I did before. It gets better and more complex with each viewing.
Hope all good with you.
Maddy
Thanks so much, Maddy! I feel the same way — the layers in this film are just endless. It’s one of those rare films where every rewatch feels like seeing it for the first time. It feels so good to finally get my thoughts out on this one, especially knowing you love this film too. Thanks for checking in, hope all is well on your end! xo
I can’t wait to share Part 3 with you!